Matic Kriznik vs Erwin Troebinger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kriznik vs E. Troebinger

Matic Kriznik
SLO
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
29
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Erwin Troebinger
ITA
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
29
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kriznik 1 - 0 Troebinger
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matic Kriznik winning 2 and Erwin Troebinger winning 1. The last match between Matic Kriznik and Erwin Troebinger was at the M15 Selva Gardena, 30-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Matic Kriznik getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kriznik | 1 |
| Troebinger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Selva Gardena(10-30-23)
Matic Kriznik
4
6
6
Erwin Troebinger
6
1
1
M. Kriznik vs E. Troebinger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 34.92% (22-41) | Career Total W/L | 20.00% (27-108) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Kriznik vs E. Troebinger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matic Kriznik has won 49.04% of points on their second serve, while Erwin Troebinger has won 41.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matic Kriznik, in recent form, has won 41.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Erwin Troebinger has won 41.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.95% and 34.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matic Kriznik has saved 52.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erwin Troebinger has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matic Kriznik has won 40.00% of matches played (W/L 4/6), with Erwin Troebinger winning 24.14% (W/L 7/22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matic Kriznik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 9/16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Erwin Troebinger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 7/20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 16% (W/L 3/16).
- Player level: In the last year, Matic Kriznik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 4/6), where as Erwin Troebinger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 24.14% of matches (W/L 7/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matic Kriznik winning 1 times and Erwin Troebinger being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Matic Kriznik winning 2 and Erwin Troebinger winning 1.
- The last match between Matic Kriznik and Erwin Troebinger was at the M15 Selva Gardena, 30-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Matic Kriznik getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matic Kriznik has played against opponents with an average rank of 312.9 while Erwin Troebinger has played against players with an average rank of 155.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matic Kriznik has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erwin Troebinger has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matic Kriznik has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erwin Troebinger has converted 37.50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matic Kriznik vs Erwin Troebinger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kriznik vs E. Troebinger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:55:0 | Average Match Time | 1:55:0 |
| 61% (43/70) | 1st Serve % | 51% (46/91) |
| 74% (32/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (30/46) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 47% (43/91) | Return Points Win % | 30% (21/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kriznik 53%, Troebinger 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kriznik 46%, Troebinger 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Kriznik 52%, Troebinger 56%.
M. Kriznik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
E. Troebinger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-2 10-8 | ||

M. Kriznik vs E. Troebinger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.92% (22/41) | YTD Win/Loss | 20.00% (27/108) |
| 36.69% (51/88) | Sets Win/Loss | 23.91% (71/226) |
| 45.63% (574/684) | Games Win/Loss | 39.54% (1092/1670) |
| 36.00% (9/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.93% (7/20) |
| 34.29% (12/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 17.50% (14/66) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 21.43% (6/22) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 91 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 157 | Total Double Faults | 146 |
| 1:39:34 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 420.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.11 |
| 58% (2074/3606) | 1st Serve % | 54% (1332/2465) |
| 63% (1305/2074) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (839/1332) |
| 46% (706/1532) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (488/1133) |
| 47% (148/313) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (55/152) |
| 39% (1384/3551) | Return Points Win % | 34% (774/2284) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 34.43% (21/40) | Futures W/L | 19.69% (25/102) |
| 33% (20/61) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (27/135) |
| 8% (1/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 28% (7/25) |
| 33% (5/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 82% (22/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 68% (34/23) |
| 18% (22/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 32% (34/11) |
| 7% (41/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (101/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction03:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
02:05
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0